<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!--RSS generated by Flaimo.com RSS Builder [2026-10-25 08:09:22]-->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"><channel><docs>https://elrepo.org/bugs/</docs><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/</link><description><![CDATA[ELRepo Bugs - Issues]]></description><title>ELRepo Bugs - Issues</title><language>en</language><category>All Projects</category><ttl>10</ttl><dc:language>en</dc:language><sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod><sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency><item><title>0001604: Problem recompiling kernel-ml since 7.2.1</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1604</link><description><![CDATA[Hallo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not a bug. I'm trying to recompile kernel-ml on my Alma Linux 9 box but since 7.2.1, it fails (I was able to recompile on the same system up to 7.1.10). I use mock to recompile my packages. I just would like to know if there is some info about the Elrepo compiling environment because apparently mine has some difference, which leads to my compilation to fail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The failing part is when it comes to compile bpftool:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
+ pushd tools/bpf/bpftool&lt;br /&gt;
+ /usr/bin/make -s 'EXTRA_CFLAGS=-O2  -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1  -m64 -march=x86-64-v2 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection' 'EXTRA_LDFLAGS=-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed  -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 ' DESTDIR=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/kernel-ml-7.2.2-1.el9.x86_64 VMLINUX_H=vmlinux.h&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Auto-detecting system features:&lt;br /&gt;
...                         clang-bpf-co-re: [ on  ]&lt;br /&gt;
...                                    llvm: [ on  ]&lt;br /&gt;
...                                  libcap: [ on  ]&lt;br /&gt;
...                                  libbfd: [ on  ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
make: Circular vmlinux.h &lt;- vmlinux.h dependency dropped.&lt;br /&gt;
cc1: warning: '-Wformat-y2k' ignored without '-Wformat' [-Wformat-y2k]&lt;br /&gt;
cc1: warning: '-Wformat-security' ignored without '-Wformat' [-Wformat-security]&lt;br /&gt;
/usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/kernel-ml-7.2.2/linux-7.2.2-1.el9.x86_64/tools/bpf/bpftool/bootstrap/main.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.8' can not be used when making a PIE object; recompile with -fPIE&lt;br /&gt;
/usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/kernel-ml-7.2.2/linux-7.2.2-1.el9.x86_64/tools/bpf/bpftool/bootstrap/common.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used when making a PIE object; recompile with -fPIE&lt;br /&gt;
/usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/kernel-ml-7.2.2/linux-7.2.2-1.el9.x86_64/tools/bpf/bpftool/bootstrap/json_writer.o: relocation R_X86_64_32S against `.rodata' can not be used when making a PIE object; recompile with -fPIE&lt;br /&gt;
/usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/kernel-ml-7.2.2/linux-7.2.2-1.el9.x86_64/tools/bpf/bpftool/bootstrap/gen.o: relocation R_X86_64_32S against `.rodata' can not be used when making a PIE object; recompile with -fPIE&lt;br /&gt;
/usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/kernel-ml-7.2.2/linux-7.2.2-1.el9.x86_64/tools/bpf/bpftool/bootstrap/btf.o: relocation R_X86_64_32S against `.rodata' can not be used when making a PIE object; recompile with -fPIE&lt;br /&gt;
/usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/kernel-ml-7.2.2/linux-7.2.2-1.el9.x86_64/tools/bpf/bpftool/bootstrap/sign.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used when making a PIE object; recompile with -fPIE&lt;br /&gt;
/usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/kernel-ml-7.2.2/linux-7.2.2-1.el9.x86_64/tools/bpf/bpftool/bootstrap/libbpf/libbpf.a(libbpf-in.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used when making a PIE object; recompile with -fPIE&lt;br /&gt;
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status&lt;br /&gt;
make: *** [Makefile:288: /builddir/build/BUILD/kernel-ml-7.2.2/linux-7.2.2-1.el9.x86_64/tools/bpf/bpftool/bootstrap/bpftool] Error 1&lt;br /&gt;
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.8VoQXv (%build)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By opening a shell into the mock build dir and trying some flags combinations, it seems that the offending part is &quot;-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld&quot; which for me, contains:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*self_spec:&lt;br /&gt;
+ %{!static:%{!shared:%{!r:-pie}}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I saw that from 7.1.10 to 7.2.1 some changes where made to the bpftool Makefile, which I think are giving my problem. I hope that someone can tell me what exact command is run in Elrepo build environment (the long make... above), what /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld contains, and in general any advice which could help me to solve the problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you.]]></description><category>kernel-ml</category><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 13:32:39 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1604</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1604#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0001606: CentOS stream 9 kernel-ml-7.2.6-1.el9.elrepo.x86_64 XFS: Assertion failed: lock_flags != 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c, line: 106</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1606</link><description><![CDATA[arch:&lt;br /&gt;
CentOS stream 9 kernel-ml-7.2.6-1.el9.elrepo.x86_64 XFS: Assertion failed: lock_flags != 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c, line: 106&lt;br /&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:root@www76&quot;&gt;root@www76&lt;/a&gt; crash]# ls -lht&lt;br /&gt;
总用量 0&lt;br /&gt;
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 67  9月 17 15:58 127.0.0.1-2026-09-17-15:58:14&lt;br /&gt;
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 67  9月 17 15:11 127.0.0.1-2026-09-17-15:11:06&lt;br /&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:root@www76&quot;&gt;root@www76&lt;/a&gt; crash]# du -sh *&lt;br /&gt;
1.2G	127.0.0.1-2026-09-17-15:11:06&lt;br /&gt;
8.0G	127.0.0.1-2026-09-17-15:58:14]]></description><category>kernel-ml</category><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 18:53:59 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1606</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1606#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0001597: OCFS2 support in EL9/10 kernel-ml/lt</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1597</link><description><![CDATA[Hello,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it possible to enable support for OCFS2 in your kernels, please?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much needed for shared block storage, big demand now from VMWare &quot;refugees&quot; migrating onto EL/KVM and needing to reuse their block storage (FC, DAS, ISCSI, NVMEoTCP etc).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ocfs2-tools also required for proper functionality, but that can be &quot;backported&quot; or simply copied from Oracle Linux since afaik OCFS2 is mainly their baby.]]></description><category>--elrepo--request-for-enhancement--</category><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 02:10:38 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1597</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1597#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0001605: Request for kmod-saa7164 package for EL9 stock kernel</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1605</link><description><![CDATA[The saa7164 module is completely absent on Rocky Linux 9 / RHEL 9:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Stock kernel (5.14.x) – Red Hat disabled CONFIG_VIDEO_SAA7164 (and many other media drivers).&lt;br /&gt;
- ELRepo kernel-lt 6.1.187-1.el9.elrepo.x86_64 – module still not built.&lt;br /&gt;
- kmod-media-0.0-7.el9_8.elrepo – does not contain saa7164.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Current status after installing kmod-media:&lt;br /&gt;
  modinfo saa7164          → Module not found&lt;br /&gt;
  find /lib/modules/$(uname -r) -name '*saa7164*'  → empty&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm using Nvidia 470 from ELRepo so I believe the best option would be to add the saa7164 driver (and its dependencies) to the kmod-media package so it works against both the stock 5.14 kernels and kernel-lt.]]></description><category>kmod-media</category><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 13:27:43 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1605</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1605#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0001610: install elrepo-release blocks all versions of almalinux</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1610</link><description><![CDATA[when I try to install elrepo-release on almalinux9 or almalinux10 the dnf command does not work on any almalinux installation. I have tried on microserver gen10 and gen8, something is wrong with the repomd.xml&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cockpit Docker Manager               970  B/s | 3.0 kB     00:03     ELRepo.org Community Enterprise Linu 0.0  B/s |   0  B     00:09     Fehler: Failed to download metadata for repo 'elrepo': repomd.xml parser error: Parse error at line: 1 (Document is empty                 )]]></description><category>elrepo-release</category><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 13:53:01 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1610</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1610#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0001609: Audio failing in kernel-ml 7.2.6 on Panther Lake, perhaps because CONFIG_SND_SOC_SDCA_CLASS isn't set</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1609</link><description><![CDATA[I'm using an Intel Panther Lake Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 with Rocky Linux 10.2.  (Panther Lake / Core Ultra 7 365)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audio works correctly with the Rocky 6.12 kernel, but does not work with ELRepo's kernel-ml 7.2.6-1.el10.elrepo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The audio controller is:&lt;br /&gt;
```&lt;br /&gt;
00:1f.3 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation Device [8086:e428] (rev 01)&lt;br /&gt;
    Subsystem: Lenovo Device [17aa:2352]&lt;br /&gt;
```&lt;br /&gt;
With 7.2.6, the controller is bound to sof-audio-pci-intel-ptl, but no ALSA sound card is created:&lt;br /&gt;
```&lt;br /&gt;
$ cat /proc/asound/cards&lt;br /&gt;
--- no soundcards ---&lt;br /&gt;
```&lt;br /&gt;
The relevant difference I have found is the SDCA configuration.&lt;br /&gt;
On the working Rocky 6.12 kernel:&lt;br /&gt;
```&lt;br /&gt;
CONFIG_SND_SOC_SDCA_CLASS=m&lt;br /&gt;
CONFIG_SND_SOC_SDCA_CLASS_FUNCTION=m&lt;br /&gt;
```&lt;br /&gt;
While on ELRepo 7.2.6:&lt;br /&gt;
```&lt;br /&gt;
# CONFIG_SND_SOC_SDCA_CLASS is not set&lt;br /&gt;
```&lt;br /&gt;
There are also no snd-soc-sdca-class.ko or snd-soc-sdca-class-function.ko modules in the 7.2.6 module tree.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Panther Lake audio device includes a SoundWire device with:&lt;br /&gt;
```&lt;br /&gt;
link 3 mfg_id 0x01fa part_id 0x4245 version 0x3&lt;br /&gt;
```&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 6.12 kernel recognizes this device through the SDCA class infrastructure. Its dmesg includes:&lt;br /&gt;
```&lt;br /&gt;
sdca_class sdw:0:3:01fa:4245:01: SWFT not available&lt;br /&gt;
input: HID sdw:0:3:01fa:4245:01 Consumer Control&lt;br /&gt;
input: HID sdw:0:3:01fa:4245:01&lt;br /&gt;
hid-generic ... SOUNDWIRE HID v1.00 Device [HID sdw:0:3:01fa:4245:01] on auxiliary&lt;br /&gt;
```&lt;br /&gt;
and subsequently SOF loads the SDCA function topologies:&lt;br /&gt;
```&lt;br /&gt;
Using function topologies instead intel/sof-ipc4-tplg/sof-ptl-dummy.tplg&lt;br /&gt;
loading topology 0: intel/sof-ipc4-tplg/sof-sdca-1amp-id2.tplg&lt;br /&gt;
loading topology 1: intel/sof-ipc4-tplg/sof-sdca-jack-id0.tplg&lt;br /&gt;
loading topology 2: intel/sof-ipc4-tplg/sof-sdca-mic-id4.tplg&lt;br /&gt;
loading topology 3: intel/sof-ipc4-tplg/sof-hdmi-pcm5-id5.tplg&lt;br /&gt;
input: sof-soundwire Jack ...&lt;br /&gt;
```&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, 7.2.6 reports:&lt;br /&gt;
```&lt;br /&gt;
No SoundWire machine driver found for the ACPI-reported configuration:&lt;br /&gt;
link 3 mfg_id 0x01fa part_id 0x4245 version 0x3&lt;br /&gt;
Use SoundWire default machine driver with function topologies&lt;br /&gt;
```&lt;br /&gt;
and eventually:&lt;br /&gt;
```&lt;br /&gt;
soundwire_intel soundwire_intel.link.3: prepare clock stop failed -110&lt;br /&gt;
soundwire_intel soundwire_intel.link.3: intel_stop_bus: cannot stop clock: -110&lt;br /&gt;
```&lt;br /&gt;
No ALSA sound card is subsequently registered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rest of the relevant SoundWire/SOF configuration appears to be present in 7.2.6, and the CS35L63 codec on link 2 also initializes successfully. Firmware is installed and loads successfully.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to know whether there is a deliberate reason that CONFIG_SND_SOC_SDCA_CLASS and CONFIG_SND_SOC_SDCA_CLASS_FUNCTION are disabled in the ELRepo kernel-ml configuration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If there is no specific compatibility reason, would ELRepo consider enabling these options in a future kernel-ml build?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For comparison, the same hardware and userspace configuration produces a working audio device with the Rocky 6.12 kernel.]]></description><category>--elrepo--request-for-enhancement--</category><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:58:36 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1609</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1609#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0001608: VHCI-HCD for Omnissa Horizon 8 Agent for Linux</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1608</link><description><![CDATA[Note: The excerpt below was via email.&lt;br /&gt;
--&lt;br /&gt;
I started looking at the Omnissa Horizon 8 Agent for Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
[snipped]&lt;br /&gt;
This is a product we need to get working on RHEL 9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It requires VHCI-HCD and V4L2Loopback with patches and kernel modules&lt;br /&gt;
build on each system for our use case. DKMS implementation is left to&lt;br /&gt;
the user. There are weekly kernel updates from Red Hat, so automating&lt;br /&gt;
kernel module rebuild is a must have.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see that ElRepo provides both solutions, but neither can be used&lt;br /&gt;
because of the patching required by Omnissa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am wondering if there is any way of making the ElRepo provided&lt;br /&gt;
packages working for the Omnissa Horizon 8 Agent and if that would&lt;br /&gt;
possibly break other use cases of those packages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Have you seen any requests for compatibility of the ElRepo provided&lt;br /&gt;
packages for the Horizon Agent?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are a couple of links to the Omnissa documentation for Omnissa&lt;br /&gt;
Horizon 8 2603, the latest Extended Service Branch (ESB) with Horizon&lt;br /&gt;
Agent for 64-bit Linux version 8.18.0:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
System Requirements for Horizon Agent for Linux - VHCI Driver for USB&lt;br /&gt;
Redirection:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://docs.omnissa.com/Desktops-and-Applications-in-Horizon-V2603/SystemRequirementsforHorizonAgentforLinux&quot; rel=&quot;noopener,nofollow&quot;&gt;https://docs.omnissa.com/Desktops-and-Applications-in-Horizon-V2603/SystemRequirementsforHorizonAgentforLinux&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(vhci-hcd-1.15.tar.gz from&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://sourceforge.net/projects/usb-vhci/files/linux%20kernel%20module/&quot; rel=&quot;noopener,nofollow&quot;&gt;https://sourceforge.net/projects/usb-vhci/files/linux%20kernel%20module/&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Install the V4L2Loopback Driver on a Linux Machine&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://docs.omnissa.com/Desktops-and-Applications-in-Horizon-V2603/InstalltheV4L2LoopbackDriveronaLinuxMachine&quot; rel=&quot;noopener,nofollow&quot;&gt;https://docs.omnissa.com/Desktops-and-Applications-in-Horizon-V2603/InstalltheV4L2LoopbackDriveronaLinuxMachine&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
v0.12.5 Source code from &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/umlaeute/v4l2loopback/tags&quot; rel=&quot;noopener,nofollow&quot;&gt;https://github.com/umlaeute/v4l2loopback/tags&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Omnissa documentation requires patching for this one, but the patch&lt;br /&gt;
does not seem to apply.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to hear your take on this situation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope to be able to connect with the Omnissa people in the next&lt;br /&gt;
couple of weeks to raise all my concerns about the packaging of this&lt;br /&gt;
solution and the fact that I feel I cannot deploy it on all the&lt;br /&gt;
systems I support in the current state.&lt;br /&gt;
Being able to use the packages from ElRepo would definitely help.]]></description><category>kmod-omn-vhci-hcd</category><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 10:05:09 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1608</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1608#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0001607: V4L2Loopback for Omnissa Horizon 8 Agent for Linux</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1607</link><description><![CDATA[Note:  The excerpt below was via email.&lt;br /&gt;
--&lt;br /&gt;
I started looking at the Omnissa Horizon 8 Agent for Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
[snipped]&lt;br /&gt;
This is a product we need to get working on RHEL 9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It requires VHCI-HCD and V4L2Loopback with patches and kernel modules&lt;br /&gt;
build on each system for our use case. DKMS implementation is left to&lt;br /&gt;
the user. There are weekly kernel updates from Red Hat, so automating&lt;br /&gt;
kernel module rebuild is a must have.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see that ElRepo provides both solutions, but neither can be used&lt;br /&gt;
because of the patching required by Omnissa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am wondering if there is any way of making the ElRepo provided&lt;br /&gt;
packages working for the Omnissa Horizon 8 Agent and if that would&lt;br /&gt;
possibly break other use cases of those packages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Have you seen any requests for compatibility of the ElRepo provided&lt;br /&gt;
packages for the Horizon Agent?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are a couple of links to the Omnissa documentation for Omnissa&lt;br /&gt;
Horizon 8 2603, the latest Extended Service Branch (ESB) with Horizon&lt;br /&gt;
Agent for 64-bit Linux version 8.18.0:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
System Requirements for Horizon Agent for Linux - VHCI Driver for USB&lt;br /&gt;
Redirection:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://docs.omnissa.com/Desktops-and-Applications-in-Horizon-V2603/SystemRequirementsforHorizonAgentforLinux&quot; rel=&quot;noopener,nofollow&quot;&gt;https://docs.omnissa.com/Desktops-and-Applications-in-Horizon-V2603/SystemRequirementsforHorizonAgentforLinux&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(vhci-hcd-1.15.tar.gz from&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://sourceforge.net/projects/usb-vhci/files/linux%20kernel%20module/&quot; rel=&quot;noopener,nofollow&quot;&gt;https://sourceforge.net/projects/usb-vhci/files/linux%20kernel%20module/&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Install the V4L2Loopback Driver on a Linux Machine&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://docs.omnissa.com/Desktops-and-Applications-in-Horizon-V2603/InstalltheV4L2LoopbackDriveronaLinuxMachine&quot; rel=&quot;noopener,nofollow&quot;&gt;https://docs.omnissa.com/Desktops-and-Applications-in-Horizon-V2603/InstalltheV4L2LoopbackDriveronaLinuxMachine&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
v0.12.5 Source code from &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/umlaeute/v4l2loopback/tags&quot; rel=&quot;noopener,nofollow&quot;&gt;https://github.com/umlaeute/v4l2loopback/tags&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Omnissa documentation requires patching for this one, but the patch&lt;br /&gt;
does not seem to apply.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to hear your take on this situation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope to be able to connect with the Omnissa people in the next&lt;br /&gt;
couple of weeks to raise all my concerns about the packaging of this&lt;br /&gt;
solution and the fact that I feel I cannot deploy it on all the&lt;br /&gt;
systems I support in the current state.&lt;br /&gt;
Being able to use the packages from ElRepo would definitely help.]]></description><category>kmod-omn-v4l2loopback</category><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 09:58:51 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1607</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1607#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0001601: Touchpad not working on kernel-ml  7.1.6-1.el9.elrepo.x86_64</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1601</link><description><![CDATA[The touchpad (ELAN0676:00, 04F3:3195) is not functional on kernel-ml 7.1.6-1.el9.elrepo.x86_64 on an Intel Lunar Lake laptop (ThinkPad, PCI 8086:64a0).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The device is present in /sys/bus/i2c/devices/ and /sys/bus/acpi/devices/ but fails to bind because i2c_hid_acpi cannot obtain an IRQ:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  /sys/kernel/debug/devices_deferred:&lt;br /&gt;
  i2c-ELAN0676:00    i2c_hid_acpi: can't get irq&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Root cause: CONFIG_PINCTRL_LNL is not enabled in kernel-ml 7.1.6. The Lunar Lake pinctrl driver (introduced in kernel 6.11) is required to resolve GPIO IRQs for I2C HID devices on this platform. The current build only includes pinctrl-meteorlake, which does not cover Lunar Lake.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stock RHEL9 kernel (5.14.0-611/687) includes a backport of this driver and the touchpad works correctly, but cannot be used due to xe DRM flip_done timeouts on Lunar Lake (separate issue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Requested fix: enable CONFIG_PINCTRL_LNL in kernel-ml builds.]]></description><category>kernel-ml</category><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 10:54:20 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1601</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1601#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0001598: Enable CONFIG_SMB_SERVER_SMBDIRECT=m in kernel-lt (EL9)</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1598</link><description><![CDATA[Both kernel-ml and kernel-lt (checked on el9, kernel-ml 7.1.2 and kernel-lt&lt;br /&gt;
6.1.176) already enable ksmbd:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  CONFIG_SMB_SERVER=m&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
but leave SMB Direct (RDMA transport for ksmbd) turned off - &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  # CONFIG_SMB_SERVER_SMBDIRECT is not set&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would it be possible to enable this? all the other rdma dependencies seem to be available, so I think it should be as simple as this one flag.]]></description><category>--kernel--request-for-enhancement--</category><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 15:45:54 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1598</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1598#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0001600: Enable Intel Acceleration in Kernel-ML</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1600</link><description><![CDATA[Without kernel parameters CONFIG_DRM_ACCEL=y and CONFIG_DRM_ACCEL_IVPU=m, /dev/accel does not get created and thus we are unable to utilize the NPU in compatible intel CPUs.]]></description><category>kernel-ml</category><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 15:43:56 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1600</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1600#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0001596: Enable CONFIG_CEPH_FS_SECURITY_LABEL in el8 kernel-lt</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1596</link><description><![CDATA[Hi, I discovered that in el8 kernel-lt the setting CONFIG_CEPH_FS_SECURITY_LABEL is not set as with the default 4.18 kernel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would it be possible to enable it?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks]]></description><category>--kernel--request-for-enhancement--</category><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 15:55:59 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1596</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1596#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0001595: Enable NTFS module and POSIX ACL</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1595</link><description><![CDATA[This is for the record. The original request was submitted to our git as a pull request:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/elrepo/kernel/pull/8&quot; rel=&quot;noopener,nofollow&quot;&gt;https://github.com/elrepo/kernel/pull/8&lt;/a&gt;]]></description><category>kernel-ml</category><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 12:44:50 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1595</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1595#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0001594: modules are not signed duing modules_install</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1594</link><description><![CDATA[I was trying to investigate the following bootup message: &quot; kernel: nfnetlink: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel&quot;. It appeared no modules are signed at all. While looking at kernel-ml-7.0.spec, I noticed a zone which is commented:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
### BCAT&lt;br /&gt;
# Further investigation is required before these features&lt;br /&gt;
# are enabled for the ELRepo Project kernels.&lt;br /&gt;
%global signkernel 0&lt;br /&gt;
%global signmodules 0&lt;br /&gt;
### BCAT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
as well as &quot;%define __modsign_install_post&quot; not using the kernel sb-sign script, and sources 21 (mod-sign.sh) and 23 (x509.genkey) missing.  Meaning modules are unsigned and kernel is tainted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If  would gladly give a hand to test any solution]]></description><category>General</category><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 08:49:38 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1594</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1594#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0001592: Enable CONFIG_BT_INTEL_PCIE in kernel-ml</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1592</link><description><![CDATA[The btintel_pcie module doesn't appear to be enabled for RHEL 9 kernel-ml. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:root@host&quot;&gt;root@host&lt;/a&gt; ~]# modinfo btintel_pcie&lt;br /&gt;
modinfo: ERROR: Module btintel_pcie not found.&lt;br /&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:root@host&quot;&gt;root@host&lt;/a&gt; ~]# grep CONFIG_BT_INTEL_PCIE /boot/config-7.0.10-1.el9.elrepo.x86_64 &lt;br /&gt;
# CONFIG_BT_INTEL_PCIE is not set&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can this module be enabled?]]></description><category>kernel-ml</category><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 21:41:04 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1592</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1592#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0001591: Realtek Wi-Fi 7 RTL8922AE</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1591</link><description><![CDATA[Hello,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just bought a motherboard with the RTL8922AE and installed RHEL9 with kernel-ml but the kmod is missing.&lt;br /&gt;
CONFIG_RTW89_8922AE seems disabled in kernel-ml as well as kernel-lt.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there any plan to add it? This wifi chip seems to be in several new motherboards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The module has been present since 6.10. kernel-ml is currently 7.0+.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regards]]></description><category>kernel-ml</category><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 13:30:11 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1591</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1591#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0001587: Update to 6.1.166-1.el9.elrepo.x86_64 breaks IOMMU groups</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1587</link><description><![CDATA[With the kernel 6.1.166-1.el9.elrepo.x86_64 I have less IOMMU groups than with the 6.1.164 or 6.19.6-1.el9.elrepo.x86_64. (See attached file).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Grouping together, eg&lt;br /&gt;
0000:07:00.0	10ec:8168 [R]	Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8211/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 0c)&lt;br /&gt;
0000:09:00.0	1002:67ef [R]	VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Baffin [Radeon RX 460/560D / Pro 450/455/460/555/555X/560/560X] (rev cf)&lt;br /&gt;
0000:09:00.1	1002:aae0	Audio device: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Baffin HDMI/DP Audio [Radeon RX 550 640SP / RX 560/560X]&lt;br /&gt;
is awkward to vfio-pci passthrough.]]></description><category>kernel-lt</category><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 21:28:57 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1587</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1587#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0001570: Enable OVPN in kernel-ml</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1570</link><description><![CDATA[Original request is from:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/elrepo/kernel/issues/4&quot; rel=&quot;noopener,nofollow&quot;&gt;https://github.com/elrepo/kernel/issues/4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will also provide a kmod package.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The request may be applied to el8, el9 and el10.]]></description><category>--elrepo--request-for-enhancement--</category><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:17:34 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1570</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1570#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0001586: Build kernel-ml-7.0.0-0.rc2</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1586</link><description><![CDATA[** This ticket is for the record **&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Observations:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The el8 kernel builds OK.&lt;br /&gt;
The el9 and el10 kernels fail to build.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following error is seen in el9 and el10 builds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/builddir/build/BUILD/kernel-ml-7.0.0/linux-7.0.0-0.rc2.el9.elrepo.x86_64/drivers/cxl/acpi.c:758: undefined reference to `devm_cxl_add_nvdimm_bridge'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Google says:&lt;br /&gt;
Version Change: In some kernel versions (specifically noted &lt;br /&gt;
around 7.0-rc2/5.14+), the function was explicitly moved to &lt;br /&gt;
cxl_pmem.ko. If your code relies on it being in cxl_core but&lt;br /&gt;
it has moved to cxl_pmem, you may get this error.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Google also says:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If CONFIG_CXL_BUS is built-in (y) but CONFIG_CXL_PMEM is a module (m), you may encounter linking issues depending on how other drivers (like cxl_root) attempt to call this bridge function. Try setting both to the same value (either both y or both m) to ensure symbols are visible during the link stage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solution:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) Set both CONFIG_CXL_BUS and CONFIG_CXL_PMEM to =y&lt;br /&gt;
  ==&gt; Did not work. Upon rnning 'make oldconfig', CONFIG_CXL_PMEM was changed to =m.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) Set both CONFIG_CXL_BUS and CONFIG_CXL_PMEM to =m&lt;br /&gt;
  ==&gt; This worked out. It also changed several other CXL-related options to =m.]]></description><category>kernel-ml</category><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 13:26:07 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1586</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1586#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0001526: MediaTek MT7925 wifi 7 controller not supported</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1526</link><description><![CDATA[I bought an ASUS TUF Gaming Motherboard (X870-PLUS WIFI) in May and I am trying to setup Rocky Linux 8.10 on it.&lt;br /&gt;
Sadly, it seems it is not supported by default. &lt;br /&gt;
I have tried to install Centos10 on the same hardware and the OS can recognize the MT7925 wifi 7 controller and works well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any help with this will be very appreciated.]]></description><category>--elrepo--request-for-enhancement--</category><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 10:28:07 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1526</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1526#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0001575: kernel-lt- 6.1.159-1.el8.elrepo fails to boot (Was: megaraid_sas module is broken in kernel-lt)</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1575</link><description><![CDATA[Tried to boot kernel-lt version 6.1.159-1.el8.elrepo.x86_64.&lt;br /&gt;
During boot there is an validation error in module:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
failed to validate module [megaraid_sas] BTF: -22]]></description><category>General</category><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 21:55:11 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1575</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1575#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0001584: DRBD fails to upgrade on Rocky8 (el8 repo) due to el10 packages in repo</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1584</link><description><![CDATA[/linux/elrepo/el8/x86_64/RPMS drbd packages with name el10 and are signed with other GPG key, I can guess naming is wrong and due this name GPG key was used from el10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
drbd90-utils-9.33.0-1.el10.elrepo.x86_64.rpm&lt;br /&gt;
drbd90-utils-sysvinit-9.33.0-1.el10.elrepo.x86_64.rpm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
on os update (with dnf update) tries to import new GPG key (as found on your documentation set to EL10 repo), this fails to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# yum update drbd90-utils.x86_64 &lt;br /&gt;
Last metadata expiration check: 3:48:59 ago on Thu 29 Jan 2026 05:04:31 AM UTC.&lt;br /&gt;
Dependencies resolved.&lt;br /&gt;
============================================================================================================================================================================================================================================&lt;br /&gt;
 Package                                                   Architecture                                        Version                                                            Repository                                           Size&lt;br /&gt;
============================================================================================================================================================================================================================================&lt;br /&gt;
Upgrading:&lt;br /&gt;
 drbd90-utils                                              x86_64                                              9.33.0-1.el10.elrepo                                               elrepo                                              962 k&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transaction Summary&lt;br /&gt;
============================================================================================================================================================================================================================================&lt;br /&gt;
Upgrade  1 Package&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total download size: 962 k&lt;br /&gt;
Is this ok [y/N]: y&lt;br /&gt;
Downloading Packages:&lt;br /&gt;
drbd90-utils-9.33.0-1.el10.elrepo.x86_64.rpm                                                                                                                                                                3.0 MB/s | 962 kB     00:00    &lt;br /&gt;
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;
Total                                                                                                                                                                                                       1.8 MB/s | 962 kB     00:00     &lt;br /&gt;
ELRepo.org Community Enterprise Linux Repository - el8                                                                                                                                                      1.6 MB/s | 1.7 kB     00:00    &lt;br /&gt;
GPG key at &lt;a href=&quot;file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-elrepo.org&quot; rel=&quot;noopener&quot;&gt;file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-elrepo.org&lt;/a&gt; (0xBAADAE52) is already installed&lt;br /&gt;
ELRepo.org Community Enterprise Linux Repository - el8                                                                                                                                                      3.0 MB/s | 3.1 kB     00:00    &lt;br /&gt;
Importing GPG key 0xEAA31D4A:&lt;br /&gt;
 Userid     : &quot;elrepo.org (RPM Signing Key v2 for elrepo.org) &lt;&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:secure@elrepo.org&quot;&gt;secure@elrepo.org&lt;/a&gt;&gt;&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Fingerprint: B8A7 5587 4DA2 40C9 DAC4 E715 5160 0989 EAA3 1D4A&lt;br /&gt;
 From       : /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-v2-elrepo.org]]></description><category>drbd90-utils</category><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 12:56:06 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1584</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1584#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0001583: 6.18 and afterwards do not contain Hyper-V drivers for network</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1583</link><description><![CDATA[hv_netvsc.ko.xz is not available.]]></description><category>kernel-ml</category><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 12:53:09 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1583</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1583#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0001428: Cannot install kmod-drbd9x in the elrepo-testing repository</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1428</link><description><![CDATA[Originally reported by Strahil Nikolov:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From: Strahil Nikolov &lt;&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:hunter86_bg@yahoo.com&quot;&gt;hunter86_bg@yahoo.com&lt;/a&gt;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
To: &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:elrepo@lists.elrepo.org&quot;&gt;elrepo@lists.elrepo.org&lt;/a&gt;&quot; &lt;&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:elrepo@lists.elrepo.org&quot;&gt;elrepo@lists.elrepo.org&lt;/a&gt;&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 10:05:30 +0000 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Subject: drbd 9.2.6 - missing dependencies&lt;br /&gt;
Hello All,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know where I can find the dependencies for the kmod-drbd9x-9.2.6-1.el9_2.elrepo.x86_64 from elrepo-testing ?&lt;br /&gt;
I want to test the encrypted DRBD replication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is the output when I tried to update from stable to testing:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# yum update kmod-drbd9x drbd9x-utils --nobest&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updating Subscription Management repositories.&lt;br /&gt;
ELRepo.org Community Enterprise Linux Repository - el9       9.8 kB/s | 3.0 kB     00:00    &lt;br /&gt;
ELRepo.org Community Enterprise Linux Testing Repository - el9       9.5 kB/s | 3.0 kB     00:00    &lt;br /&gt;
ELRepo.org Community Enterprise Linux Kernel Repository - el9       9.9 kB/s | 3.0 kB     00:00    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dependencies resolved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package kmod-drbd9x-9.1.18-2.el9_3.elrepo.x86_64&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  - nothing provides ksym(tls_client_hello_x509) = 0xdc6e1a05 needed by kmod-drbd9x-9.2.6-1.el9_2.elrepo.x86_64 from elrepo-testing&lt;br /&gt;
  - nothing provides ksym(tls_handshake_cancel) = 0xd156d53d needed by kmod-drbd9x-9.2.6-1.el9_2.elrepo.x86_64 from elrepo-testing&lt;br /&gt;
  - nothing provides ksym(tls_server_hello_x509) = 0x7810b390 needed by kmod-drbd9x-9.2.6-1.el9_2.elrepo.x86_64 from elrepo-testing&lt;br /&gt;
============================================================================================================&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Package             Architecture   Version                      Repository                      Size&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
============================================================================================================&lt;br /&gt;
Installing:&lt;br /&gt;
 kernel              x86_64         5.14.0-362.18.1.el9_3        rhel-9-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms   4.9 M&lt;br /&gt;
Upgrading:&lt;br /&gt;
 kmod-drbd9x         x86_64         9.2.5-1.el9_2.elrepo         elrepo-testing                  383 k&lt;br /&gt;
Installing dependencies:&lt;br /&gt;
 kernel-core         x86_64         5.14.0-284.25.1.el9_2        rhel-9-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms   17 M&lt;br /&gt;
 kernel-core         x86_64         5.14.0-284.30.1.el9_2        rhel-9-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms   17 M&lt;br /&gt;
 kernel-modules      x86_64         5.14.0-284.30.1.el9_2        rhel-9-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms   37 M&lt;br /&gt;
 kernel-modules      x86_64         5.14.0-362.18.1.el9_3        rhel-9-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms   37 M&lt;br /&gt;
 kernel-modules-core x86_64         5.14.0-284.25.1.el9_2        rhel-9-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms   36 M&lt;br /&gt;
 kernel-modules-core x86_64         5.14.0-284.30.1.el9_2        rhel-9-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms   36 M&lt;br /&gt;
Removing:&lt;br /&gt;
kernel-core          x86_64         5.14.0-70.30.1.el9_0         @rhel-9-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms  73 M&lt;br /&gt;
 kernel-core         x86_64         5.14.0-362.13.1.el9_3        @rhel-9-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms  63 M&lt;br /&gt;
 kernel-modules-core x86_64         5.14.0-362.13.1.el9_3        @rhel-9-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms  26 M&lt;br /&gt;
Removing dependent packages:&lt;br /&gt;
 kernel              x86_64         5.14.0-70.30.1.el9_0         @rhel-9-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms  0  &lt;br /&gt;
 kernel              x86_64         5.14.0-362.13.1.el9_3        @rhel-9-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms  0  &lt;br /&gt;
 kernel-modules      x86_64         5.14.0-70.30.1.el9_0         @rhel-9-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms  20 M&lt;br /&gt;
 kernel-modules      x86_64         5.14.0-362.13.1.el9_3        @rhel-9-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms  31 M&lt;br /&gt;
Skipping packages with broken dependencies:&lt;br /&gt;
 kmod-drbd9x         x86_64         9.2.6-1.el9_2.elrepo         elrepo-testing                  402 k&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transaction Summary&lt;br /&gt;
==============================================================================================================&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Install  7 Packages&lt;br /&gt;
Upgrade  1 Package&lt;br /&gt;
Remove   7 Packages&lt;br /&gt;
Skip     1 Package&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total download size: 185 M&lt;br /&gt;
Is this ok [y/N]: N&lt;br /&gt;
Operation aborted.]]></description><category>kmod-drbd90</category><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 11:39:02 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1428</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1428#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>0001489: Cannot install kmod-drbd90-9.2.12 in the elrepo-testing repository</title><author></author><link>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1489</link><description><![CDATA[kmod-drbd90-9.2.12-1.el8_10.elrepo.x86_64.rpm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
$ sudo dnf --enablerepo=elrepo-testing install kmod-drbd90&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Error: &lt;br /&gt;
 Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job&lt;br /&gt;
  - nothing provides ksym(tls_client_hello_x509) = 0x1f41fa53 needed by kmod-drbd90-9.2.12-1.el8_10.elrepo.x86_64 from elrepo-testing&lt;br /&gt;
  - nothing provides ksym(tls_handshake_cancel) = 0x61a0d881 needed by kmod-drbd90-9.2.12-1.el8_10.elrepo.x86_64 from elrepo-testing&lt;br /&gt;
  - nothing provides ksym(tls_server_hello_x509) = 0xa76f1444 needed by kmod-drbd90-9.2.12-1.el8_10.elrepo.x86_64 from elrepo-testing&lt;br /&gt;
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)]]></description><category>kmod-drbd90</category><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 11:29:13 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1489</guid><comments>https://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=1489#bugnotes</comments></item></channel></rss>
